Showing posts with label conspiracy theories. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conspiracy theories. Show all posts

Saturday, September 10, 2011

IF, GOD FORBID, THERE IS A SEQUEL TO THE 9/11/01 ATTACKS: EXPECT THE HIJACKED AIRLINERS TO BE AIRBUS A330s

8 June 2009: Brazilian Navy recovers tail fin of Air France Flight 447
12 May 2010: Officials inspect the tail fin of Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771

As the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches, the majority of Americans believe the official conspiracy theory, which holds that these attacks were carried out with super-human stealth and precision by a group of Arabs well known to have been total bunglers before 9/11/01, see here for instance. These Americans have the so-called mainstream media to thank for implanting and constantly refreshing the official conspiracy theory in their minds, while deprecating as “conspiracy theorists” anyone remarking on the myriad contradictions between the official theory and what is publicly known.

Indeed, former Reagan Asst. Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts poses this riddle:
“One would think that if a handful of Arabs managed to outwit not merely the CIA and FBI but all 16 US intelligence agencies, all intelligence agencies of our allies including Mossad, the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times on one morning, air traffic control, etc., the President, Congress, and the media would be demanding to know how such an improbable event could occur. Instead, the White House put up a wall of resistance to finding out, and Congress and the media showed little interest.”
No member of any of the U.S. Government agencies listed above has ever been accused of dereliction of duty much less been subjected to disciplinary action. I find this ironic, given that I was actually threatened with disciplinary action for creating a lampoon of the Naval Research Laboratory’s internal news paper (for my own amusement, but someone did me no favor by posting one of the few “eyes-only” copies on a lab bulletin board). Surely NORAD’s dismal failure on the morning of 9/11/01 was a more punishable offence than mine, yet there is no evidence that anyone at NORAD was ever disciplined. However, the big difference is that I was the lone miscreant. By contrast, if some lowly officer at NORAD had been charged with failure to do his duties on the morning of 9/11, he might have said he was following orders from his boss, who if charged might have blamed his boss, etc., etc. Surely, avoidance of up-the-chain-of-command finger pointing can be the only solution to PCR’s riddle.

Even members of the 9/11 Commission have become convinced that the government lied to them about what they knew and when they knew it regarding the happenings of the morning of 9/11/01. For example see here. Why would they lie? ...unless the government had a lot to hide.

All of this leaves open the possibility of the 9/11 attacks having been an inside job, of which high members of the government had foreknowledge (even though the operation was surely secretly in preparation for a decade or more). In fact long before 9/11/01 I was an eye witness to two bizarre aviation events in the vicinity of the Pentagon that in retrospect I regard as preparatory for the 9/11/01 attack. Beginning with this insight, I worked out how insiders probably did it. In its simplest description, the allegedly hijacked airliners switched places with drone attack aircraft and/or fighter planes to spoof the radars. Thus, in my model, upon unwitnessed landings at remote locations of Flights AA 11, UA 175, AA 77, and UA 93, those passengers who were not co-conspirators were murdered in cold blood.

I am convinced that the aircraft that hit WTC 2 was a Boeing 767 converted to a drone. And this would surely have entailed years of work and testing, because Boeings normally require pilot pressure on the steering column to maneuver.

By contrast, Airbus jetliners are “fly by wire,” requiring no pilot pressure. So if the bad guys should steal one of these, all they would have to do would be to add a computer module capable of cutting off the pilot’s ability to control the aircraft and turn over full control to someone on the ground or in a nearby aircraft. This way they could murder the passengers and crew without looking them in the face.

The bad news is that I believe “the bad guys” have stolen two Airbus A330’s and faked the cover stories that they had crashed. I list them below. Note that each of the two aircraft was identified solely by its miraculously surviving tail fin.
(1) Air France Flight 447, June 1, 2009: Supposedly lost at sea in a storm not considered dangerous by an experienced meteorologist. It took fully six days of searching before any bodies or identifiable debris were found. My hypothesis is that the plane was landed somewhere in Africa where there would have been no witnesses. Again the passengers were murdered in cold blood, as I supposed to be the case for the innocent 9/11/01 passengers. I envision that the first few bodies and selected identifiable debris were flown out by a small plane. Two days after that more bodies and the tail fin were apparently flown out, presumably on a larger plane.

(1a) A new tail fin suitable for re-flying the Flt 447 aircraft could have been obtained from another Airbus crash the same month. See here and here.

(2) Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771, May 12, 2010: Supposedly crashed in clear air conditions while landing in Libya, where the only identifiable debris was the tail fin. The rest looked to be the contents of several garbage trucks spread out on the ground. See here and here.
Many readers know that Larry Silverstein leased – and insured – the World Trade Center towers two weeks before the 9/11/01 attacks and collected insurance payments of $3.6 billion for each tower. But how many know that Larry is now the owner of the Sears Tower?

So it would be a good idea not to fly A330s or hang out in downtown Chicago tomorrow, or on 11/11/11...

Monday, April 19, 2010

Just because you don't want to be known as a conspiracy theorist doesn't mean some conspirators aren't out to get you.

The first time I heard the ironic truism "Just because you know you're paranoid doesn't mean someone out there isn't out to get you" it fell from the lips of my third-level supervisor who was quipping to someone else within my earshot. Nowadays, the mainstream media constantly runs articles leading us to believe that only Muslim terrorists are out to get us and that any "conspiracy theorists" who think differently are paranoid kooks.

But what if the most dangerous terrorists are actually powerful global corporations and rogue groups within our government who have been responsible not only for the 9/11 attacks but all sorts of other nasty things ...like staging a pandemic?

According to a neighbor of ours down here in San Carlos who watches nothing but Mexican TV every night, two months before the first case of H1N1 swine flu was reported in March of 2009 as having been contracted by a 5-year-old boy in the tiny town of La Gloria, down wind of the larger pig-raising town of Xaltepec, about half way between the coast of the State of Veracruz and the City of Puebla, Mexican TV extensively covered the opening of a "billion dollar" plant for manufacturing vaccines located some place "between Puebla and Veracruz."

The company name is AstraZeneca. Wikipedia tells much about AstraZeneca, but nothing about a new vaccine plant in Mexico. An AstraZeneca web site gives the address of its Mexican Operations as Lomas Verdes, Naucalpan on the western outskirts of Mexico City.  So there seems to be no public record of the exact location of the "billion dollar" plant that Mexican TV was picking up on months before -- and after -- the appearance and rapid spread of swine flu 2009 H1N1.

By June 2009 this new virus was declared a "phase 6" pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) by arbitrarily changing the rule to mean essentially any new disease that may spread around the world irregardless of its communicability or mortality rate. In fact, by that time data from the southern hemisphere had shown that the new swine flu has a lower mortality rate and complications rate than the annual flu.

But by falsely raising the alarm to phase 6, WHO was able to act on the authority granted to it by the UN to command that the entire world be vaccinated -- an edict that would grant the world's pharmaceutical industry a multi-billion-dollar windfall by guaranteeing big-time buyers of their untestested -- and unneeded -- vaccines comprising most of the developed countries of the world. I've extensively chronicaled this history in an earlier post.

Would it be too paranoid to believe that the global pharmaceutical industry in collusion with the WHO would spread a virus to make us sick (and an an unpredictable number of us dead) in order to boost their profits by many billions of dollars? Or are you totally unable to believe anyone would do such a dastardly thing ...even when they clearly have the motive, means, and opportunity?

Personally, I subscribe to this quote attributed to Edmund Burke:

“There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men.”

Does anyone remember that the 1918 pandemic flu virus was resurrected in 2005?  Well, it was ...with the help of the body of an infected woman exhumed from the Alaska permafrost.

Flash forward to last month:

Below I reproduce parts of a "News of the Week" article appearing in the 26 March 2010 issue of the prestigious magazine Science. For easier reading and better focus on my point, I have suppressed in my redacted version below (1) many highly technical portions of the article that are neutral to the case I'm suggesting, (2) comments by researchers in the pay of the pharmaceutical industry, and (3) some scientists' counter-intutive speculations to the effect that maybe evolution really can run backwards.

For anyone wishing to read the entire article, I've made it available for downloading here.

Please study the included figure at least until you come to understand what it is that I'm thinking.

_______________________________________________________
www.sciencemag.org   SCIENCE   VOL 327   26 March 2010

SWINE FLU PANDEMIC

What’s Old Is New: 1918 Virus Matches 2009 H1N1 Strain

The “novel” H1N1 swine influenza virus that last year caused the first human pandemic in 4 decades has one feature that is hardly novel: Its surface protein, hemagglutinin (HA) — which spikes cells and starts an infection — closely matches the HA in the H1N1 virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic. Separated by 91 years, the two strains of the highly mutable virus ought to be vastly different. This newfound similarity answers many mysteries about the 2009 pandemic, including why it largely spared the elderly. The new findings from different research groups also suggest intriguing explanations for how the 1918 influenza virus has evolved since it swept across the globe in several waves, killing more than 50 million people by the winter of 1919. And the investigators are proposing provocative—some say far-fetched—vaccination strategies to preempt future pandemics.
...
One study published 24 March in Science Translational Medicine shows that even though nearly a century separates the widespread circulation of the two viruses in humans, mice given a vaccine against the 1918 strain produced antibodies that “neutralized” the novel 2009 strain. When the team flipped the experiment and used a 2009 pandemic vaccine in mice, the immune response stopped the 1918 virus. “We kind of did a double take,” says virologist Gary Nabel, head of the Vaccine Research Center at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in Bethesda, Maryland, and the lead researcher on the project.
...
When Nabel, Terrence Tumpey of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, and their co-workers focused on the amino acids in a discrete region of the HA tip that plays a critical role in binding to cells, they discovered a 95% similarity between the old and new pandemic strains. Comparisons between seasonal and the pandemic strains in this region found less than 70% similarity.
...

...“The closest related structure that we have to the current 2009 swine flu is the 1918 structure,” says [structural biologist Ian Wilson of the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego, California], who also analyzed sequences from many other influenza viruses that have circulated in humans between those two pandemics.