 |
| 8 June 2009: Brazilian Navy recovers tail fin of Air France Flight 447 |
 |
| 12 May 2010: Officials inspect the tail fin of Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771 |
As the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches, the majority of Americans believe the
official conspiracy theory, which holds that these attacks were carried out with super-human stealth and precision by a group of Arabs well known to have been total bunglers before 9/11/01,
see here for instance. These Americans have the so-called mainstream media to thank for implanting and constantly refreshing the official conspiracy theory in their minds, while deprecating as “conspiracy theorists” anyone remarking on the myriad contradictions between the official theory and what is publicly known.
Indeed, former Reagan Asst. Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts poses
this riddle:
“One would think that if a handful of Arabs managed to outwit not merely the CIA and FBI but all 16 US intelligence agencies, all intelligence agencies of our allies including Mossad, the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times on one morning, air traffic control, etc., the President, Congress, and the media would be demanding to know how such an improbable event could occur. Instead, the White House put up a wall of resistance to finding out, and Congress and the media showed little interest.”
No member of any of the U.S. Government agencies listed above has ever been accused of dereliction of duty much less been subjected to disciplinary action. I find this ironic, given that I was actually threatened with disciplinary action for creating a lampoon of the Naval Research Laboratory’s internal news paper (for my own amusement, but someone did me no favor by posting one of the few “eyes-only” copies on a lab bulletin board). Surely NORAD’s dismal failure on the morning of 9/11/01 was a more punishable offence than mine, yet there is no evidence that anyone at NORAD was ever disciplined. However, the big difference is that I was the lone miscreant. By contrast, if some lowly officer at NORAD had been charged with failure to do his duties on the morning of 9/11, he might have said he was following orders from his boss, who if charged might have blamed his boss, etc., etc. Surely, avoidance of up-the-chain-of-command finger pointing can be the only solution to PCR’s riddle.
Even members of the 9/11 Commission have become convinced that the government lied to them about what they knew and when they knew it regarding the happenings of the morning of 9/11/01. For example
see here. Why would they lie? ...unless the government had a lot to hide.
All of this leaves open the possibility of the 9/11 attacks having been an
inside job, of which high members of the government had foreknowledge (even though the operation was surely secretly in preparation for a decade or more). In fact long before 9/11/01 I was an eye witness to two bizarre aviation events in the vicinity of the Pentagon that in retrospect I regard as preparatory for the 9/11/01 attack. Beginning with this insight, I worked out how insiders probably did it. In its simplest description, the allegedly hijacked airliners switched places with drone attack aircraft and/or fighter planes to spoof the radars. Thus,
in my model, upon unwitnessed landings at remote locations of Flights AA 11, UA 175, AA 77, and UA 93, those passengers who were not co-conspirators were murdered in cold blood.
I am convinced that the aircraft that hit WTC 2 was a Boeing 767 converted to a drone. And this would surely have entailed years of work and testing, because Boeings normally require pilot pressure on the steering column to maneuver.
By contrast, Airbus jetliners are “fly by wire,” requiring no pilot pressure. So if the bad guys should steal one of these, all they would have to do would be to add a computer module capable of cutting off the pilot’s ability to control the aircraft and turn over full control to someone on the ground or in a nearby aircraft. This way they could murder the passengers and crew without looking them in the face.
The bad news is that I believe “the bad guys” have stolen two Airbus A330’s and faked the cover stories that they had crashed. I list them below. Note that each of the two aircraft was identified solely by its miraculously surviving tail fin.
(1) Air France Flight 447, June 1, 2009: Supposedly lost at sea in a storm not considered dangerous by an
experienced meteorologist. It took fully six days of searching before
any bodies or identifiable debris were found. My hypothesis is that the plane was landed somewhere in Africa where there would have been no witnesses. Again the passengers were murdered in cold blood, as I supposed to be the case for the innocent 9/11/01 passengers. I envision that the first few bodies and selected identifiable debris were flown out by a small plane.
Two days after that more bodies and the tail fin were apparently flown out, presumably on a larger plane.
(1a) A new tail fin suitable for re-flying the Flt 447 aircraft could have been obtained from another Airbus crash the same month. See
here and
here.
(2) Afriqiyah Airways Flight 771, May 12, 2010: Supposedly crashed in clear air conditions while landing in Libya, where the only identifiable debris was the tail fin. The rest looked to be the contents of several garbage trucks spread out on the ground. See
here and
here.
Many readers know that Larry Silverstein leased – and insured – the World Trade Center towers two weeks before the 9/11/01 attacks and collected insurance payments of
$3.6 billion for each tower. But how many know that Larry is now the
owner of the Sears Tower?
So it would be a good idea not to fly A330s or hang out in downtown Chicago tomorrow, or on 11/11/11...
Also on TV news the morning of 11 September 2001 were (1) an on-the-scene reporter who found no evidence that a large aircraft had struck the Pentagon (only small fragments "you could pick up with you hands") and (2) two reporters at Shanksville, PA, where UA Flt 93 was supposed to have crashed, who after circling the hole in the ground on foot reported finding nothing at all, not even tiny fragments. The embed code for this video has been withdrawn "by request" but it can be played at the following link under the title "9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show You" (unjustly dissing Dan Rather, who was the one who astutely asked whether the WTC towers might have been brought down by explosives, only to be contradicted by the "expert" who appeared unexpectedly in his newsroom):
http://youtu.be/_0eC3uns3pA
