Thursday, January 24, 2013


Blogger's Note: Go here for the original plus the opportunity to  subscribe to free email notifications of other videos of interest that  you won't learn from the mainstream media.  Additional Sandy Hook  inconsistencies can be found in my Sunday January 20th post, the second below this one. The text immediately below was provided by Brasscheck TV  as a synopsis of the six videos that follow. Note that while the  first  five are strictly audio, the sixth is a video. You will not find any  conspiracy theorizing here -- only a plethora of official stories that  simply don't add up.

What do you know about Nancy Lanza?

1. She was a "prepper" [sic]

2. She owned a legally registered AR-15

3. She took her son Adam shooting.

When did you "learn" these things?

Very early on, right?

What was the source of this "information?"

Here's some facts:

1. The Wall Street Journal sent a reporter to visit all the gun ranges in the area to find where Nancy and Adam Lanza went shooting.


No gun range within a 50 mile radius ever saw them.

2. Connecticut has some of the the strictest gun laws in the nation.

So-called "assault rifles" were already banned in the state.

Thus, if Nancy Lanza did own this gun, she did not own it legally.

3. Nanzy Lanza was a "prepper" [sic].


Who says so?

Where's the evidence?

An "unnamed source" very soon after the crime occurred - with no follow up evidence.

What else do we know about Nancy Lanza?

What was her profession? Where did she work? Where did she grow up? Who were her parents, siblings, extended family?

We know nothing. Zero.

Why is that?

Yet we "know" she was a prepper, she was gun owner and she practiced shooting at local gun ranges.

All false.

If these "early facts" are false, what else is?

Sandy Hook The Gun Range Myth

Published on Jan 23, 2013

Sandy Hook Step One: Entry

Published on Jan 23, 2013

Sandy Hook AR 15 Reality Check

Published on Jan 23, 2013

Sandy Hook The Lanza Family

Published on Jan 22, 2013

"As reported in Rolling Stone, these three employees of General Electric subsidiary GE Capital were recently found guilty of conspiring with major Wall Street banks from around 1999 to 2006 of fixing public auctions of municipal bonds"

Sandy Hook Who is Adam Lanza

Published on Jan 22, 2013

Has Adam Lanza Even Been Alive The Last 3 Years?

Published on Jan 5, 2013

There is ZERO online fingerprint of him, there is ZERO video evidence, there is ZERO car insurance, tax information, phone history. There is ZERO proof this guy has even been alive for the last 3 years.

The neighbors haven't seen him in years, nobody who lives around the Lanzas seems to have seen him, and the last time there is any record of him at all was 3 years ago.

The FBI apparently can't retrieve the information from his computer it was so well destroyed (how convenient).

What is more likely.. that a computer nerd would leave "No digital footprint for 3 years" (which would be practically impossible) or that he has been dead for 3 years?

No record of this kid after 2009 - after supposedly attending college at Central Connecticut State University in Danville - nothing.

Nobody knows him, nobody has seen him, and there is no video or other proof he is even alive- why is this guy being treated as the main suspect again?

His mom was supposedly "so badly disfigured they couldn't tell if it was her or not" Maybe it wasn't her. Maybe she's in Belize right now and this whole thing is a scam?

I guess we're taking Adam's dad's word for collecting his son's body- a guy who works for GE capital (GE owns NBC) and his brother? Both of whom are connected to New York finance?

Nobody "falls off the grid" for 3 years.. it just doesn't happen.

As Shillers List pointed out in the comments below, the only picture they like to show of Adam Lanza is a very strange ghostly looking picture, when there are many other pictures of him that look pretty normal.

The same thing happened with Jared Loughner the alleged Tucson gunman, who had this normal picture which hardly EVER gets shown to the public:

Originally, it was not cropped, and he's holding a kickoff magazine - The public only sees the "freakish" looking Loughner picture, they don't want his tan, good looking "sports fan" side being shown, as that doesn't fit their agenda.

No comments: