One 77-year-old’s search for the truth: 9/11, election fraud, illegal wars, Wall Street criminality, a stolen nuke, the neocon wars, control of the U.S. government by global corporations, the unjustified assault on Social Security, media complicity, and the "Great Recession" about to become the second Great Depression. "The most important truths are hidden from us by the powerful few who strive to steal the American dream by keeping We the People in the dark."
Blogger's Note: Go here for the originalplus the opportunity to subscribe to free email notifications of other videos of interest that you won't learn from the mainstream media.
Additional Sandy Hook inconsistencies can be found in my Sunday January 20th post, the second below this one.
The text immediately below was provided by Brasscheck TV as a synopsis of the six videos that follow. Note that while the first five are strictly audio, the sixth is a video. You will not find any conspiracy theorizing here -- only a plethora of official stories that simply don't add up.
What do you know about Nancy Lanza? 1. She was a "prepper" [sic] 2. She owned a legally registered AR-15 3. She took her son Adam shooting. When did you "learn" these things? Very early on, right? What was the source of this "information?" Here's some facts: 1. The Wall Street Journal sent a reporter to visit all the gun ranges in the area to find where Nancy and Adam Lanza went shooting. Result? No gun range within a 50 mile radius ever saw them. 2. Connecticut has some of the the strictest gun laws in the nation. So-called "assault rifles" were already banned in the state. Thus, if Nancy Lanza did own this gun, she did not own it legally. 3. Nanzy Lanza was a "prepper" [sic]. Really? Who says so? Where's the evidence? An "unnamed source" very soon after the crime occurred - with no follow up evidence. What else do we know about Nancy Lanza? What was her profession? Where did she work? Where did she grow up? Who were her parents, siblings, extended family? We know nothing. Zero. Why is that? Yet we "know" she was a prepper, she was gun owner and she practiced shooting at local gun ranges. All false. If these "early facts" are false, what else is?
Has Adam Lanza Even Been Alive The Last 3 Years? http://youtu.be/MmSKS4hwJ24 Published on Jan 5, 2013 There is ZERO online fingerprint of him, there is ZERO video evidence, there is ZERO car insurance, tax information, phone history. There is ZERO proof this guy has even been alive for the last 3 years. The neighbors haven't seen him in years, nobody who lives around the Lanzas seems to have seen him, and the last time there is any record of him at all was 3 years ago. The FBI apparently can't retrieve the information from his computer it was so well destroyed (how convenient). What is more likely.. that a computer nerd would leave "No digital footprint for 3 years" (which would be practically impossible) or that he has been dead for 3 years? No record of this kid after 2009 - after supposedly attending college at Central Connecticut State University in Danville - nothing. Nobody knows him, nobody has seen him, and there is no video or other proof he is even alive- why is this guy being treated as the main suspect again? His mom was supposedly "so badly disfigured they couldn't tell if it was her or not" Maybe it wasn't her. Maybe she's in Belize right now and this whole thing is a scam? I guess we're taking Adam's dad's word for collecting his son's body- a guy who works for GE capital (GE owns NBC) and his brother? Both of whom are connected to New York finance? Nobody "falls off the grid" for 3 years.. it just doesn't happen. -------------------- As Shillers List pointed out in the comments below, the only picture they like to show of Adam Lanza is a very strange ghostly looking picture, when there are many other pictures of him that look pretty normal. The same thing happened with Jared Loughner the alleged Tucson gunman, who had this normal picture which hardly EVER gets shown to the public: http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/CRIME/01/08/arizona.shooting/t1main.loughner.fb.jpg Originally, it was not cropped, and he's holding a kickoff magazine - The public only sees the "freakish" looking Loughner picture, they don't want his tan, good looking "sports fan" side being shown, as that doesn't fit their agenda.
Agenda Driven News December 19, 2012 | Original Here
I have known for a long time that US news is agenda-driven. Tonight
(December 18) I was made aware of the extent to which agenda-driven US
news drives the news of the rest of the world. For reasons unbeknownst to me, Russia Today Moscow requested a live
TV interview via Skype about the Newtown, Connecticut, school shootings
that killed 20 young children and several adults. I was interested to
know what was Moscow’s interest in the shootings, and I agreed to the
interview. I was surprised to see that RT Moscow’s interest was to spread the
official US story of the shootings and to ask me if I thought “assault
weapons” would be banned as a consequence. Many things can be an assault weapon. A baseball bat, a knife, a
fist, a foot, a single shot .22 rifle, a double-barrel shotgun, a
fireplace poker, a six-shot revolver, a brick, a sword, a bow and arrow,
a lance. A person can add many items to this short list. Gun-control advocates have defined “assault weapon” to be a
semi-automatic civilian version of military weapons, such as AR-15, the
civilian version of the military M-16, and AK-47. During the Clinton
administration the civilian version of these weapons was not permitted
to have various harmless features because the features made the rifles
have a military appearance, and the weapons were restricted to magazines
that held no more than ten rounds. Today 20 and 30 round magazines are available. For a professional,
the capacity of the magazines is immaterial. With experience a person
can change clips in a second. A button is pushed, the clip drops out and
a new one is inserted. For reasons hard to follow, gun control
advocates think that a ten-round clip turns an “assault weapon” into
something else. I told RT Moscow that the United States was the most complete police
state in human history. Thanks to modern technology, Washington is able
to spy on its subjects far beyond the capabilities of Joseph Stalin and
Adolf Hitler. Even George Orwell’s imagination in his dystopian novel,
1984, has been surpassed by Washington’s current practice. The “war on
terror” is the excuse for the American Police State. A police state, I said, was inconsistent with an armed population,
and as all other constitutional amendments have fallen, the sole
remaining amendment, the Second Amendment, will not survive much longer.
But why RT Moscow’s focus on “assault weapons”? The accused, Adam
Lanza, was immediately declared guilty. According to the Associated
Press, the Newtown, Connecticut medical examiner, Dr H. Wayne Carver
said that “all the victims of the Connecticut elementary school shooting
were killed up close by multiple rifle shots.” http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/183651631.html Yet Fox News http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/20346133/reports-of-multiple-dead-including-1-child-from-ct-elementary-school-shooting
reports that “A CNN reporter said police recovered three weapons at the
scene: a Glock and a Sig-Sauer, which are handguns, as well as a .223
Bushmaster rifle. The rifle was in the back seat of the car the gunman
drove to the school, the handguns were inside the school.” The same Fox News report says: “Security measures implemented this
year at Sandy Hook [the school] kept doors locked during class hours,
and people have to be buzzed in before entering. There is a camera to
view whoever enters the building.” If this report is correct, how did
an armed Lanza gain entry to the school? I tried to point out to RT Moscow that these news reports indicate
that the accused dead gunman, whom no one can interrogate, if he is
indeed the culprit, killed the children with handguns, not with an
“assault rifle” left in the car, but that the medical examiner said the
children were killed with rifle shots. The discrepancy is obvious. Either the news reports are incorrect,
the medical examiner is wrong, or someone other than Adam Lanza shot the
children. This was too much for RT Moscow’s news anchor. She cut me off with
her statement that the children were dead by whatever gun. Yet, the
focus of the program was on “assault rifles.” This focus was reinforced
when I was asked to stay online for a post-interview question. The question from RT Moscow was whether I thought assault weapons
would be banned. I answered that I thought all guns would be banned. I
had already told the TV anchor that I thought that all guns would be
taken away from US subjects, but that I doubted the efficacy of the ban.
I told the news anchor that during the early part of the 20th century,
the US, in all its wisdom, had a ban on alcohol, but alcohol was
everywhere available. The alcohol ban was the origin of the crime
syndicates’ fortunes. Today we have the drug ban, going back decades.
The result is that drugs are everywhere, and drug syndicates are making
billions. It will not be much different with a gun ban. England has a
gun ban, but criminals have guns, and today the formerly unarmed British
police are heavily armed. When I lived in England, guns were not
banned and the police carried nightsticks, not firearms. The focus on “assault weapons” is puzzling for another reason.
According to news reports Lanza had a personality or mental disorder, or
perhaps he was just different. Regardless, he was on medication. So does the blame lie with guns or with medication? As the agenda is to ban guns, the blame is placed on guns. In the previous mass shooting at the Colorado movie theater,
eyewitness accounts differed from the official account, and according to
news accounts the suspect was involved with the government in some sort
of mind control experiments and was found after the shooting sitting in
a car in the movie theater parking lot. Similarly, the Connecticut school shooting has puzzling aspects. In
the real time report to the police, a teacher says that she saw “two
shadows running past the gym.” http://sgtreport.com/2012/12/so-many-questions-too-few-answers-was-the-sandy-hook-massacre-an-organzied-false-flag-operation/
The police radio recording also reports two men in a van at the school
stopped and detained, and various news sources report that the police
arrested a man in the nearby woods. The man says, “I didn’t do it,” but
how would a man out in the woods know what had just happened? There are
no TVs to watch in the woods; yet, the man denied doing the shooting.
Very strange. What often happens is that there are a number of initial false
reports, such as in the Connecticut case the report that Lanza’s mother
was a teacher at the school and was killed at the school, that Lanza had
also killed his father, and that Lanza’s brother might have been
involved. Any discrepancies in the official story then get thrown out
with the false reports. As the media simply goes along with the
official story and does not investigate, it is impossible to know what
really happened. People just accept the official story. It seems odd, however, that RT Moscow would uncritically follow the
US media in reporting the official story after experiencing, for
example, the US media’s intentional misreporting of the Georgian-Russian
war, which was started by the former Soviet republic of Georgia but
blamed on Russia. Does RT Moscow really believe the US media that the US
missile bases surrounding Russia are directed at Iran? Americans have been well armed for several centuries, but “gun violence” is new. Why? Are there more disturbed people? More medicated people? Have
Americans lost self-control, their moral conscience? Are Americans
being molded by violent movies and video games and by eleven years of
their government’s slaughter of other peoples? Have Americans lost
empathy for others? Tom McNamara, a lecturer at the French National Military Academy, asks: “Do Arabs Cry For Their Children Too?” http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/12/18/do-arabs-cry-for-their-children-too/print The Connecticut school shooting is a tragedy in more ways than one.
Children lost their lives, families lost their children, and the tragedy
is being used to disarm Americans faced with a police state growing in
power and menace.
Agenda Driven News December 19, 2012 | Original Here I have known for a long time that US news is agenda-driven. Tonight
(December 18) I was made aware of the extent to which agenda-driven US
news drives the news of the rest of the world. For reasons unbeknownst to me, Russia Today Moscow requested a live
TV interview via Skype about the Newtown, Connecticut, school shootings
that killed 20 young children and several adults. I was interested to
know what was Moscow’s interest in the shootings, and I agreed to the
interview. I was surprised to see that RT Moscow’s interest was to spread the
official US story of the shootings and to ask me if I thought “assault
weapons” would be banned as a consequence. Many things can be an assault weapon. A baseball bat, a knife, a
fist, a foot, a single shot .22 rifle, a double-barrel shotgun, a
fireplace poker, a six-shot revolver, a brick, a sword, a bow and arrow,
a lance. A person can add many items to this short list. Gun-control advocates have defined “assault weapon” to be a
semi-automatic civilian version of military weapons, such as AR-15, the
civilian version of the military M-16, and AK-47. During the Clinton
administration the civilian version of these weapons was not permitted
to have various harmless features because the features made the rifles
have a military appearance, and the weapons were restricted to magazines
that held no more than ten rounds. Today 20 and 30 round magazines are available. For a professional,
the capacity of the magazines is immaterial. With experience a person
can change clips in a second. A button is pushed, the clip drops out and
a new one is inserted. For reasons hard to follow, gun control
advocates think that a ten-round clip turns an “assault weapon” into
something else. I told RT Moscow that the United States was the most compete police
state in human history. Thanks to modern technology, Washington is able
to spy on its subjects far beyond the capabilities of Joseph Stalin and
Adolf Hitler. Even George Orwell’s imagination in his dystopian novel,
1984, has been surpassed by Washington’s current practice. The “war on
terror” is the excuse for the American Police State. A police state, I said, was inconsistent with an armed population,
and as all other constitutional amendments have fallen, the sole
remaining amendment, the Second Amendment, will not survive much longer. But why RT Moscow’s focus on “assault weapons”? The accused, Adam
Lanza, was immediately declared guilty. According to the Associated
Press, the Newtown, Connecticut medical examiner, Dr H. Wayne Carver
said that “all the victims of the Connecticut elementary school shooting
were killed up close by multiple rifle shots.” http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/183651631.html Yet Fox News http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/20346133/reports-of-multiple-dead-including-1-child-from-ct-elementary-school-shooting
reports that “A CNN reporter said police recovered three weapons at the
scene: a Glock and a Sig-Sauer, which are handguns, as well as a .223
Bushmaster rifle. The rifle was in the back seat of the car the gunman
drove to the school, the handguns were inside the school.” The same Fox News report says: “Security measures implemented this
year at Sandy Hook [the school] kept doors locked during class hours,
and people have to be buzzed in before entering. There is a camera to
view whoever enters the building.” If this report is correct, how did
an armed Lanza gain entry to the school? I tried to point out to RT Moscow that these news reports indicate
that the accused dead gunman, whom no one can interrogate, if he is
indeed the culprit, killed the children with handguns, not with an
“assault rifle” left in the car, but that the medical examiner said the
children were killed with rifle shots. The discrepancy is obvious. Either the news reports are incorrect,
the medical examiner is wrong, or someone other than Adam Lanza shot the
children. This was too much for RT Moscow’s news anchor. She cut me off with
her statement that the children were dead by whatever gun. Yet, the
focus of the program was on “assault rifles.” This focus was reinforced
when I was asked to stay online for a post-interview question. The question from RT Moscow was whether I thought assault weapons
would be banned. I answered that I thought all guns would be banned. I
had already told the TV anchor that I thought that all guns would be
taken away from US subjects, but that I doubted the efficacy of the ban.
I told the news anchor that during the early part of the 20th century,
the US, in all its wisdom, had a ban on alcohol, but alcohol was
everywhere available. The alcohol ban was the origin of the crime
syndicates’ fortunes. Today we have the drug ban, going back decades.
The result is that drugs are everywhere, and drug syndicates are making
billions. It will not be much different with a gun ban. England has a
gun ban, but criminals have guns, and today the formerly unarmed British
police are heavily armed. When I lived in England, guns were not
banned and the police carried nightsticks, not firearms. The focus on “assault weapons” is puzzling for another reason.
According to news reports Lanza had a personality or mental disorder, or
perhaps he was just different. Regardless, he was on medication. So does the blame lie with guns or with medication? As the agenda is to ban guns, the blame is placed on guns. In the previous mass shooting at the Colorado movie theater,
eyewitness accounts differed from the official account, and according to
news accounts the suspect was involved with the government in some sort
of mind control experiments and was found after the shooting sitting in
a car in the movie theater parking lot. Similarly, the Connecticut school shooting has puzzling aspects. In
the real time report to the police, a teacher says that she saw “two
shadows running past the gym.” http://sgtreport.com/2012/12/so-many-questions-too-few-answers-was-the-sandy-hook-massacre-an-organzied-false-flag-operation/
The police radio recording also reports two men in a van at the school
stopped and detained, and various news sources report that the police
arrested a man in the nearby woods. The man says, “I didn’t do it,” but
how would a man out in the woods know what had just happened? There are
no TVs to watch in the woods; yet, the man denied doing the shooting.
Very strange. What often happens is that there are a number of initial false
reports, such as in the Connecticut case the report that Lanza’s mother
was a teacher at the school and was killed at the school, that Lanza had
also killed his father, and that Lanza’s brother might have been
involved. Any discrepancies in the official story then get thrown out
with the false reports. As the media simply goes along with the
official story and does not investigate, it is impossible to know what
really happened. People just accept the official story. It seems odd, however, that RT Moscow would uncritically follow the
US media in reporting the official story after experiencing, for
example, the US media’s intentional misreporting of the Georgian-Russian
war, which was started by the former Soviet republic of Georgia but
blamed on Russia. Does RT Moscow really believe the US media that the US
missile bases surrounding Russia are directed at Iran? Americans have been well armed for several centuries, but “gun violence” is new. Why? Are there more disturbed people? More medicated people? Have
Americans lost self-control, their moral conscience? Are Americans
being molded by violent movies and video games and by eleven years of
their government’s slaughter of other peoples? Have Americans lost
empathy for others? Tom McNamara, a lecturer at the French National Military Academy, asks: “Do Arabs Cry For Their Children Too?” http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/12/18/do-arabs-cry-for-their-children-too/print The Connecticut school shooting is a tragedy in more ways than one.
Children lost their lives, families lost their children, and the tragedy
is being used to disarm Americans faced with a police state growing in
power and menace.
