One 77-year-old’s search for the truth: 9/11, election fraud, illegal wars, Wall Street criminality, a stolen nuke, the neocon wars, control of the U.S. government by global corporations, the unjustified assault on Social Security, media complicity, and the "Great Recession" about to become the second Great Depression. "The most important truths are hidden from us by the powerful few who strive to steal the American dream by keeping We the People in the dark."
Showing posts with label stolen elections. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stolen elections. Show all posts
Saturday, November 29, 2014
Writer, nuclear power expert, and green-powered-Earth advocate Harvey Wasserman reflects on how much better our country would have been today if President Kennedy had not been cruelly taken from us by conspirators never quite identified ...except maybe now in the must-watch preceding post!
Can We Ever Recover from the Murder of John Kennedy?
Harvey Wasserman | November 24, 2014 7:25 am
The images we ingest never cease to shape us.
Just 51 years ago, the head of a profoundly gifted young man was blown apart.
A few months earlier he’d given a speech that promised a new dawn.
He reached out to our enemies. He talked of going to the moon, of technological breakthrough and human promise. And he stopped the radioactive madness of atmospheric Bomb testing, a reason many of us are alive today.
It’s easy to idealize John Kennedy.
We still debate what he might have done in Vietnam.
But since the war did escalate, and we know the horrible costs to us all, then the possibility that he might have gotten us out gnaws at our soul.
So does not being sure about who actually killed him.
And then there’s the horror of the moment itself. A fellow human, blown apart before our eyes.
It hurts to think about it. To write about it. How can sorrow not reign in our hearts over this terrible human image that so deeply defines us?
As a nation, we still feel the murder of Abraham Lincoln. Having won a Constitutional Amendment to end slavery, he was the only one to smooth the transition from civil war to progressive peace. We still pay for losing him.
And for the image of a good man, seated happily in a theater, next to his wife … as a time for healing is unbearably shattered by a bullet to the head.
Russia never really recovered after Alexander II, a rare reformist czar, was murdered in 1881 while moving his nation toward a democratic constitution.
Michael Collins was a violent Irish revolutionary who turned to peace amidst a horrendous civil war.
Could he have ended it? All we know is the Troubles dragged on a ghastly seven decades after he was shot.
Mahatma Gandhi led the world’s first successful nonviolent anti-imperial campaign, then fasted nearly to the death to help halt a Hindu-Muslim civil war.
Then he was shot. And what is the outcome?
Egypt’s Anwar Sadat and Israel’s Yitzhak Rabin were also murdered. And what’s come since?
In America … Medgar Evers and Malcolm X, Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy … and then John Lennon.
Around the world, names we don’t know. Faces we haven’t seen. Social movements crushed, freedoms lost, good people killed (too often by our own government) deadening the soul.
And who is next? Does all this mean activists of great heart and artists for social change inevitably court a death sentence?
It’s long been clear, for a wide variety of reasons, that we cannot rely on “great leaders” to save our world for us.
But can our minds and souls ever recover from such horrible images repeatedly rammed into our brains?
Lynn Stuart Parramore has written with brilliance at AlterNet about the traumas we all face in today’s America.
In their wake, we are being poisoned by a ghastly, malignant class of zombie corporations somehow granted human rights and no human responsibilities.
They have gutted the Democratic Party and seized our government.
Their cancer is of injustice, cynicism, pollution and war.
Avoidable poverty, racism for the hell of it, a gutted democracy, eco-suicide for private profit, perpetual war for its own sake … they all metastasize to feed the corporate tumor.
Another election has been bought, rigged, stolen and lynched. The internet is endangered. Likewise our civil liberties.
So do we turn our heads “until the darkness goes”?
Or do we face the unthinkable head-on, and refuse to blink (except momentarily—we all need a break from time to time) at what we see?
Somehow we have survived since John Kennedy was killed. Kids have been born … and so have social movements … along with many surprising twists of fate.
We are winning a culture war barely begun in 1963.
Silent Spring had just been published. An avid sailor, we don’t know how JFK might have interacted with a nascent environmental movement.
But born it was. A half-century later, Solartopian technologies are poised to green-power our economy. We have the means to survive in harmony with our Mother Earth.
But can we muster the political power to cure our corporate cancer?
Richard Nixon has come and gone. So have Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush.
Now “Hope and Change” join them in the compost of history. They came too cheap. They meant too little.
Apparently we have more lessons to learn, more inner strength to build.
Departed friend, whoever you might have become, whatever you might have done, you have left us no choice.
The better angels of our souls now demand that we ask not what our planet can do for us …
HARVEY WASSERMAN’S HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES is at www.solartopia.org, along with SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH. In 1960, he saw John Kennedy speak on the steps of the Ohio statehouse.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
ELECTIONS RIGGED IN THE U.S.? YOU WON'T HEAR IT FROM THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN IT'S NOT TRUE.
A few questions for the popular pundit that may help better educate both him and the nation's electorate...
By Brad Friedman on 10/21/2012, 12:56pm PT
This morning, NBC News' top election expert, Chuck Todd, tweeted the following...
Todd was responding, no doubt, to the many folks who have been justifiably concerned of late, since it was discovered that a bunch of Bain Capital investors, led by Mitt Romney's son Tagg, via a company called H.I.G. Capital (believed to stand for Hart Intercivic Group) took over control of Hart Intercivic, the nation's third largest voting machine company, in 2011.
The Austin-based Hart company, according to VerifiedVoting.org's database, supplies electronic voting machines and paper ballot tabulators that will be used to tally votes in the Presidential Election this year in all or parts of California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington.
I offered my point of view about those concerns earlier this month, explaining that it was not just the private ownership of Hart's machines by Romney backers which voters should be concerned about, but the private ownership of the similar systems in all fifty states that will once again be used to tabulate the results of this year's Presidential Election with little --- and very often zero --- possibility of oversight by the public or even by election officials.
Todd does an extraordinary disservice to the electorate with Tweets like the one above, and I'd be happy to come on his daily MSNBC show any time to explain why, as I have told him via Twitter in response to the above.
As Todd has not responded in kind, and to expand upon my response to Todd there, I'd like to ask him these few respectful questions...
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when paper ballot optical-scan tabulators made by Sequoia Voting Systems in Palm Beach County declared incorrect results of three different races last March, including declaring two losing candidates to be the "winners"?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when the Canadian firm, Dominion Voting, which now owns Sequoia Voting Systems admitted the failure in Palm Beach was caused by a bug in all versions of its central tabulation software which will be used to tabulate the Presidential Election (and many others) on November 6th this year in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when, despite using Dominion/Sequoia's recommended "fix", the same problem occurred yet again in Palm Beach County's August primary elections, as their Supervisor of Elections recently explained to me on air?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when 16,632 votes were found unaccounted for when those same machines were first used in Palm Beach County back in 2008?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when eight (8) top election officials --- including the County Clerk, a Circuit Court Judge and the School Superintendent --- in Clay County, KY were sentenced last year to 156 years in federal prison for gaming elections, including changing the votes of voters on ES&S electronic touch-screen voting machines?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when the President of Diebold Election Systems, Inc. (by then renamed Premier Election Systems, which is now owned by the Canadian firm Dominion Voting) admitted in 2008 that the company's GEMS central tabulation software, used in some 34 states, does not tabulate votes correctly and routinely drops thousands of them when they are uploaded to the central server?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when Diebold/Premier's spokesman admitted to the CA Secretary of State during a 2009 hearing that the supposedly permanent "audit logs" in all versions of its GEMS central tabulation system fail to record the deletion of ballots, after it was discovered that their electronic tabulator had failed to tabulate hundreds of paper ballots in a Humboldt County election (or to even notify system administrators that it had deleted those ballots)?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when the CA Sec. of State decertified federally-certified electronic voting and tabulation systems made by Diebold, Sequoia and Hart Intercivic in 2007 after a state-commissioned team of computer science and security experts from the University of California, Livermore National Laboratories and elsewhere "demonstrated that the physical and technological security mechanisms" for all of the state's electronic voting systems (also used across the rest of the country) "were inadequate to ensure accuracy and integrity of the elections results and of the systems that provide those results" and that their "independent teams of analysts were able to bypass both physical and software security measures in every system tested"?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when the 2007 landmark study commissioned by OH's then Democratic Sec. of State, found "Ohio's electronic voting systems have 'critical security failures' which could impact the integrity of elections in the Buckeye State" and when she (unsuccessfully) recommended, along with the then Republican Speaker of the Senate, who is now the state's Republican Sec. of State, that all touch-screen systems in the state be decertified due to concerns of, as she told The BRAD BLOG, "viruses that can be inserted into [Ohio's e-voting and tabulation] system through something as simple as a PDA [Personal Digital Assistant] and a magnet and then the cards are passed from machine to machine almost like Typhoid Mary" so that "If there is malicious software, like a virus put into the system, it can not only affect the machines at the polling places, it can affect the tabulation that occurs at the server and it can also affect future elections if it's not detected"?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when the New York Daily News discovered in 2012 that hundreds of paper ballots at just one precinct in the Bronx went uncounted in 2010 during the September primary (failure rate of 70%) and the November general election (failure rate of 54%) on their brand new ES&S DS200 paper ballot optical-scanners, which are also used in OH, AZ, MI and elsewhere?
• Was it 'conspiracy' garbage when the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) released a warning in 2011 from a "Formal Investigation Report" that those same systems failed to count paper ballots correctly, on the heels of Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), OH's previous finding that 10% of those machines failed during pre-election testing in 2010?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when Oakland County, MI wrote a letter of concern to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), seeking advice in 2008 after finding their ES&S M-100 optical scanners "yielded different results each time" the "same ballots were run through the same machines" during pre-election testing?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when Princeton University discovered in 2006 that they could, in seconds time, implant a virus onto Diebold touch-screen systems used in dozens of states which could then spread itself from machine to machine and result in an entire county's election being flipped with little chance of detection?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when a computer security expert hacked a memory card on a Diebold paper ballot optical-scan system and flipped the results of a mock election (see the hack and its results as captured in HBO's Emmy-nominated 2006 documentary Hacking Democracy here) in such a way that only a hand-count of the paper ballots in the election could reveal the true results?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when a CIA cybersecurity expert testified to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission(EAC) in 2009 that e-voting was not secure, "that computerized electoral systems can be manipulated at five stages, from altering voter registration lists to posting results" and that "wherever the vote becomes an electron and touches a computer, that's an opportunity for a malicious actor potentially to...make bad things happen"?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' that the Vulnerability Assessment Team (which also monitors nuclear facilities) at Argonne National Laboratory (the non-profit research lab operated by the University of Chicago for the Dept. of Energy) released a report earlier this year finding that Diebold's touch-screen systems and, according to the team's lead scientist, "pretty much every electronic voting machine", can be hacked with just $10.50 in parts and an 8th grade science education, or just $26 if you want to do it remotely?
• Was it 'conspiracy garbage' when, in Volusia County, FL's 2000 Presidential Election a paper-based optical-scan tabulator made by Global Elections Management Systems (GEMS, thereafter purchased by Diebold to become Diebold Election Systems, Inc.) tallied negative 16,022 votes for Al Gore thanks to a supposed "software flaw" which has never been explained by anyone, and which Leon County (Tallahassee), FL's Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho --- the man, so well respected by both major parties, that he was placed in charge of the aborted 2000 Presidential Election recount in Florida --- believes was a purposeful hack of the electronic tabulation system which is now used in hundreds of counties in dozens of states?I could go on and on, obviously, but I won't. You're welcome. There are some 10 years worth of articles at The BRAD BLOG that folks can peruse to determine the facts underscoring my concerns and those of the others who have legitimately expressed them to you, Chuck Todd, about private, unaccountable corporations --- owned by associates of Mitt Romney or by anybody else --- having so much unoverseeable control of our once-public electoral system.
But, to misinform your 272,035 Twitter followers, not to mention your millions of viewers on television, that concerns about oft-failed, easily-manipulated electronic voting and tabulation systems are little more than "conspiracies" which "belong in the same category as the Trump birther garbage" is an extraordinary disservice to your readers, your viewers and the U.S. electorate as a whole.
They deserve a much better understanding of our electoral system from someone such as yourself, who is relied upon by so many as an expert in these matters.
Again, I would welcome the opportunity to discuss these concerns with you on your Daily Rundown show on MSNBC any time.
If, in fact, you are correct, that these concerns are little more than 'conspiracy garbage', you will do the electorate a great service by having me on, and putting me in my place once and for all by explaining why.
If these concerns are not 'conspiracy garbage', as I would argue, you would be performing a great service to the electorate by helping the electorate understand why they are not, and what voters may be able to do at this point to help minimize the possibilities of their votes not being counted accurately or transparently, or even at all, this November 6th.
Either way, the electorate will end up being much better informed before this year's Presidential Election, which is, after all, as I'm sure we can both agree, the most important core function of your job --- and mine --- as journalists.
Thursday, June 07, 2012
WISCONSIN'S RECALLED GOVERNOR SCOTT WALKER ATTRIBUTED HIS VICTORY TO VOTERS PREFERING "LEADERS WHO STAND UP AND MAKE TOUGH DECISIONS." (LIKE CUTTING THEIR SALARIES AND BENEFITS AND FIRING THEIR CHILDREN'S TEACHERS?) EVEN MORE IRONIC, WALKER'S OPPONENT BARRETT CONCEDED WITH THE COMMENT "WE HAVE SEEN THIS DEMOCRACY COME ALIVE." (LIKE DEMOCRACY IS YOUR RIGHT TO GO TO THE POLLS THINKING YOU ARE "THROWING THE BUM OUT" AND THEN ACCEPTING THAT YOUR VOTE MAY HAVE BEEN MISCOUNTED?) THERE IS VOLUMINOUS EVIDENCE THAT U.S. ELECTIONS ARE ROUTINELY RIGGED ...THAT IS IF YOU HAVE OTHER SOURCES OF NEWS THAN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA. YET THIS TIME EVEN LIBERAL NEWS SOURCES LIKE DEMOCRACY NOW ATTRIBUTE WALKER'S UNEXPECTED WIN TO HIS SPENDING 7 TIMES AS MUCH MONEY AS HIS OPPONENT. NOW LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT... IF I'M RECALLING A GOVERNOR BECAUSE HE IS SAVAGING MY STANDARD OF LIVING, AM I GOING TO BE SO DAZZLED BY HIS EXPENSIVE ATTACK ADS THAT I DECIDE TO KEEP HIM? TO ME WE HAVE JUST SEEN OUR DEMOCRACY *DIE*. DON'T THINK SO? READ BELOW AND WEEP.
← Conspiracy Theories and Mathematical Probabilities Go here for original
Wisconsin Recall: The adjusted Final Exit Poll was forced to match an unlikely recorded vote
Richard Charnin |
June 6, 2012
The media and the exit pollsters have done it again.
Before the first votes were posted, the media reported that based on
the exit polls, the election was “too close to call”. But Walker won by a
solid 7% margin and 173,000 votes. Why the big red shift?
Why did the media not provide the actual unadjusted exit poll data (the “crosstabs”)? Was it because they knew that they would have to adjust the poll to match a bogus recorded vote and did not want the public to view the impossible “adjustments”?
The solid 53.2-46.3% Walker win was more than implausible since voter
turnout exceeded that of the 2010 election. Walker “won” the recorded
vote 52.2-46.6% in a supposed low-turnout election. But who turned out
in droves in 2012? Democrats and independents who wanted Walker out. The
grossly unpopular Walker could not have done better than he did in 2010
– only worse.
And as is always the case, there was no mention of the fraud factor
in the mainstream media. There never is. To the exit pollsters and the
media, there is no such thing as election fraud.
The GOP employs overt voter disenfranchisement in plain sight by
robocalls, election workers discouraging voters from using paper
ballots, etc. But we are supposed to believe that they would not
covertly program the voting machines to flip votes from Barrett to
Walker in cyberspace? And even if the machines are manufactured and
programmed by right-wing organizations using unverifiable code.
The conventional wisdom is very conventional – and very misleading:
The NY Times Election site has the FINAL, adjusted exit poll crosstabs:
Here are just a few exit poll oddities:
1) A full 5% of voters were not white or black. But their vote is n/a.
2) Philosophy: 13% of liberals voted for Walker?
3) Party ID: 34% Democrat/ 35% Republican in a progressive state?
4) Labor: Just 62% voted for Barrett?
5) Obama preferred by 51-44%, yet Barrett lost the recall by 53.2-46.3%?
6) Barrett only got 81% of would-be Obama voters?
7) 47% voted for Walker in 2010 and just 34% for Barrett?
Walker only “won” by 52.2-46.6% in 2010.
8) Urban vote: Barrett gets just 62% in the big cities?
If we assume an equal 75% Obama and McCain voter turnout in the
recall, a 50/50 split in new and returning third party voters, then in
order to match the recorded vote, Walker needed 28% of returning Obama
voters while Barrett had just 5% of returning McCain voters. That is a
very implausible net 23% defection of Obama voters.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDRwcWRPTUZoZk53YUlxOEVMT0FnX3c#gid=32
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDRwcWRPTUZoZk53YUlxOEVMT0FnX3c#gid=32
The True Vote Model indicates that Barrett should have won easily –
assuming the caveat of a fair election. But the election was stolen. Its
still the same old story – a case of do or die.
About Richard Charnin
In 1965, I graduated from Queens College (NY) with a BA in
Mathematics. I later obtained an MS in Applied Mathematics from Adelphi
University and an MS in Operations Research from the Polytechnic
Institute of NY.
I started out as a numerical control engineer/programmer for a major
defense/aerospace manufacturer and then moved to Wall Street as a
manager/developer of corporate finance quantitative applications for
several major investment banks. I consulted in quantitative
applications development for major domestic and foreign financial
institutions, investment firms and industrial corporations.
In 2004 l began posting weekly "Election Model" projections based on
state and national polls. As "TruthIsAll", I have been posting election
analysis to determine the True Vote ever since.
Saturday, December 24, 2011
CHRISTMAS GRINCH: A TALE OF TWO CITIES IN TWO COUNTRIES, WHEREIN THE POOR HAVE BEEN DEPRIVED OF A VOICE AND REDUCED TO SLAVE LABOR BY THEIR SELF-APPOINTED GLOBAL CORPORATE MASTERS WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM NAFTA
Original Here
THURSDAY DEC 22, 2011 8:14 am
When Democracy Becomes Disposable
BY ROGER BYBEE![]() |
| Benton Harbor Emergency Manager Joseph Harris speaks at the MLGMA Summer Conference 2011, held on July 28 in St. Joseph, Mich., a town next door to Benton Harbor. (Photo courtesy Michigan Municipal League/Flickr) |
The seedy but highly profitable laboratory revealed by Bowden, also author of the harrowing book Murder City about narco wars in Juarez, brings together the 19th-century model of sweatshop labor with 21st-century technology to generate maximum earnings for the U.S.-owned firms while offering minimal pay under NAFTA's protections.
In 1999, for example, GE CEO Jack Welch collected $92 million in compensation, more than his 15,000 Mexican workers combined. U.S.-based corporations pay no taxes and only minimal annual fees in Juarez, so the vast majority of social costs are borne by the citizenry. As former Juarez Mayor Gustavo Elizondo explains, "We have no way to provide water, sewage, and sanitation works. Every year we get poorer and poorer even though we create more and more wealth."
But at the opposite end of the globalization process from Juarez, there's another laboratory conducting a related experiment : Benton Harbor, Mich., which once hosted jobs that have moved to places like Juarez. Like the workers in Juarez, impoverished residents of Benton Harbor—which is 92 percent African-American—have been stripped of democratic rights.
In Juarez, the prevalence of fraudulent political elections stolen and brutal repression have deprived the mostly female "maquiladora" workforce in assembly plants of any meaningful voice in either their workplaces or society.
In Benton Harbor, a unionized manufacturing workforce has been cast aside and the presence of nearly 10,000 overwhelmingly poor and black people are a potential obstacle to corporations like Whirlpool implementing a plan for redeveloping the area. Benton Harborites, too, have been rendered utterly powerless.
Thanks to Public Act 4, promoted by a Whirlpool ally and signed by GOP Gov. Rick Snyder, Benton Harbor Emergency Manager Joe Harris gained expanded powers to override decisions made by the democratically elected City Council and School Board. He literally expelled the elected mayor from his own office. Harris and other managers can also negate union contracts and other city agreements.
Gov. Snyder seems to believe that a state takeover of cities is more essential to their health than providing actual financial aid, which has been reserved for Michigan corporations in the form of $1.7 billion in tax cuts. Meanwhile, in part because of state budget cuts, Harris plans to raise water rates by about 40 percent even though 20 percent of the city's residents can't or won't pay city fees.
The Whirlpool Corp., headquartered in Benton Harbor, is playing a huge role in re-shaping the city, specifically in two major projects:
- A heavily taxpayer "incentivized" new corporate campus for 4,000 professionals, as Whirlpool began off-shoring jobs in the 1980s (its Fort Smith Ark. plant is being relocated to Mexico)
- A 530-acre Harbor Shores development including a Jack Nicolaus-designed golf course, high-end shopping, and condominiums. Whirlpool is also busy promoting an "Arts District" that attracts many affluent whites but few local black residents.
To skeptics of the redevelopment of Benton Harbor, Whirlpool looks less like a good corporate citizen than another company manipulating the system, leveraging its power to maximize its tax breaks and taking advantage of the town's access to federal and state grant money. (It's worth noting that Whirlpool hasn't paid any federal corporate income taxes in the United States for the last three years, partly, the company says, because of losses due to the recession.)But the recession explanation covers only a small part of Whirlpool's tax picture, according to Matt Gardner, executive director of the Washington, DC-based Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy. Losses in recent years of economic troubles in the U.S. have been offset by foreign profits.
Further, in 2007, Whirlpool reported U.S. profits of $103 million, but earned an additional $701 million abroad that will not be taxed until Whirlpool brings the money back into the United States. Moreover, Whirlpool got a federal tax rebate of $28 million that year. In 2006, $231 million in U.S. earnings were topped off by another $388 million in foreign profits.
Whirlpool's central role in the town and redevelopment plans has led many Benton Harbor residents to feel that the corporation views them as distinctly disposable and mainly a barrier to their plans. As Mahler summarizes,
It's being converted into a resort town for wealthy weekenders and Whirlpool employees that, when all is said and done, its struggling black population will either be driven out by the development or reduced to low-wage jobs cleaning hotel rooms, carrying golf bags or cutting grass.Mahler observes,
The juxtaposition of Benton Harbor's impoverished population and its two rising monuments to wealth -- all wedged into a little more than four square miles -- make it almost a caricature of economic disparity in America.The Benton Harbor scenario is actually a familiar one for other de-industrialized cities wracked by massive industrial job loss or poor cities wrecked by natural disasters. As Hurricane Katrina tore off roofs and exposed the destroyed interiors of homes, it also peeled back the genteel veneer of elite opinion about New Orleans revealing that many top corporate and political figures viewed the majority of its residents to be essentially irrelevant, if not an outright impediment, to the restructuring of the city's devastated economy.
But at the same time, it offers a window into one possible future for towns across the country, places that can no longer support their own economies or take care of their citizens and may ultimately have no choice but to turn their fate over to private industry and nonprofits. The way things are going, more and more states may start to look like Michigan, and more and more towns may start to look like Benton Harbor.
The flight of the city's poorest citizens was viewed openly as a chance for a fresh start. It not only removed a substantial part of the Big Easy's poor, black population for whom the city's economic leaders no longer saw as their responsibility to provide employment, but it also severely diminished their voting power and ability to have a role in determining how the city would be rebuilt.
The Arts District formula being applied to Benton Harbor has also been tried out in my hometown of Racine, Wis., a factory town of 80,000 hollowed out by the loss of well over 40 percent of its manufacturing base since 1980.
The solution: replacing more than 13,000 mostly unionized factory jobs with a new art museum and a cluster of art galleries and crafts shops. New York Times reporter Robert Sharoff fully bought into this re-invented Racine, a vision seemingly derived from the work of neo-liberal urbanist Richard Florida:
This formerly gritty industrial city roughly 70 miles north of Chicago and 30 miles south of Milwaukee on the shores of Lake Michigan has been trying for much of the last decade to reinvent itself as an artistÕs colony and tourist destination. The efforts have included the opening of the $11 million Racine Art Museum on Main Street in 2003 and the creation of a gallery district centering on nearby Sixth Street.This stunning premise that the museum and 12 art galleries could significantly fill in the economic Grand Canyon left by the destruction of 13,000 family-supporting factory jobs reflects the same mentality that can view the Harbor Shores development as a path to prosperity for Benton Harbor's impoverished African-American population.
Despite Mahler's moving and insightful description of a de-industrialized city being re-shaped by those who destroyed the economic base, with the victims being deprived of any voice, he fails to point out several fundamental features:
- Those harmed most by past corporate decisions are treated as disposable people standing in the way of corporate-defined reconstruction.
- Democracy and public participation are early victims to this process.
- With corporate elites having shrunken government's public-interest role in planning and economic development, major "job-creation projects" must be shaped around generating profit with the needs of the majority a negligible concern.
It's a formula for private benefit with public funding, for a distorted form of "development" devoid of democracy or public benefit.
Friday, December 31, 2010
Thursday, October 07, 2010
Since 2004, the Presidential Election Exit Polls have been readjusted at the end of day, forcing them to match the "official" results. However, these polls also gathered demographic information (in order to remain statistically "fair and balanced"). But these demographic numbers are unavoidably readjusted in the end-of-the-day forcing process -- leading to some stunning inferences. Do you agree with them?
Proof that Obama Won by Much More than 9.5 Million Recorded Votes
Richard Charnin (TruthIsAll)
October 7, 2010
Go here for the True Vote Analysis:
http://richardcharnin.com/ObamaProof.htm
In 2004, Bush won the recorded vote by 62-59 million.
It is a standard operating procedure for exit pollsters to force the final exit poll to match the recorded vote.
Do you agree that the Final 2004 National Exit Poll was forced to match the recorded vote?
Yes.
Bush had 50.46 million recorded votes in 2000. Approximately 2.5 million Bush voters died and 2 million did not return to vote in 2004. Therefore, there could not have been more than 46 million returning Bush voters.
Do you agree?
Yes.
But the Final 2004 NEP indicates that 52.6 million Bush voters returned in 2004.
That means there were 6.6 million phantom returning Bush voters. That is an impossible 110% turnout of living 2000 Bush voters.
Do you agree?
Yes.
Blogger's note: The National Election Pool (NEP) is a consortium of American news organizations formed in 2003 to provide "information on Election Night about the vote count, election analysis and election projections." See Wikipedia.Did you ever hear or read about this anomaly in the mainstream media?
No.
OK, now let’s move on to 2008. Obama won by 9.5 million recorded votes.
Do you agree that the Final 2008 NEP was forced to match the recorded vote?
Yes.
Then you must believe the Final NEP Obama and McCain shares of returning and new voters.
Yes.
The Final indicates that there were 12 million more returning Bush than Kerry voters. But that is not plausible (Bush had a 22% approval rating on Election Day 2008).
Do you agree?
Yes, I agree that 12 million is not plausible - but it is possible.
The Final 2008 NEP indicates a 103% turnout of living 2004 Bush voters.
That is impossible, right?
Yes.
Therefore the Final 2008 NEP returning Bush 46% weighting must be incorrect, right?
Yes.
The Final 2008 NEP also indicates 5.25 million returning third-party voters (4% of the electorate). But there were only 1.2 million recorded third-party votes in 2004.
Therefore the Final 2008 NEP returning third-party 5% weighting must be incorrect, right?
Yes.
Correcting to feasible returning voter percentage weights should show that Obama won by more than 9.5 million votes, right?
Yes.
Ok, let’s assume that in 2008, Bush, Kerry and third-party voters turned out in equal proportion to their 2004 recorded vote. That is a plausible if there was zero fraud in 2004 (i.e. the recorded vote was equal to the True Vote).
Do you agree?
Yes.
Assuming proportional returning voter turnout, Obama won by 14.7 million votes.
But virtually all election analysts have concluded that the 2004 election was stolen. Kerry won the unadjusted state exit poll aggregate by 52-47%.
If Kerry won the election by 52-47%, then Obama won by 22 million votes. But the True Vote Model indicates that Kerry won by 53.5-45.1%, a 10.5 million vote margin.
If Kerry won by 53.5 - 45.1%, then Obama won the True Vote by 22.9 million.
The True Vote calculations used the same Final 2008 National Exit Poll vote shares that were forced to match the recorded vote. So there can be no argument there.
The 103% turnout of living 2004 Bush voters as indicated in the Final 2008 NEP was impossible. So there can be no argument there.
The 5.25 million returning 2004 third-party voters as indicated in the Final 2008 NEP was impossible. So there can be no argument there.
Impossible 2004 (110%) and 2008 (103%) returning voter turnout ratios were replaced by feasible 98% and 97% turnout. So there can be no argument there.
Q.E.D.
Thursday, July 02, 2009
What Do YOU Do when You Know Your Democracy Is Being Stolen?


OOPS! We rigged the Iran/Florida-Ohio vote count AGAIN!!
by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman
June 23, 2009
Iran's Ayatollahs have just admitted that in some 50 cities there were as many as 3 million more votes cast than there were voters in the recent presidential election.
But, they say, that's not enough to change the outcome. So, like Florida in 2000 and Ohio 2004, there will be no total recount and no new election. Election theft should be opposed, whether it's sanctioned by a supreme Ayatollah or the U.S. Supreme Court.
It's as if the Iranian government is being advised by Ohio's former Imam J. Kenneth Blackwell, who, as Ohio's 2004 Secretary of State, purged hundreds of thousands of voters, and stole, switched and disappeared enough votes to put George W. Bush in the White House for a second term. The dubious Iranian tallies look very similar to the inflated Bush outcomes in 12 Republican southwest Ohio counties, most notably Warren, Clermont and Butler. They are reminiscent of the vote counts in two precincts in Perry County that reported turnouts of 121% and 118% of registered voters.
The chief difference between Iran 2009 and Ohio 2004---and Florida 2000----is in the opposition. Iran's Mir Hussein Moussavi has vowed martyrdom.
John Kerry, trailing in Ohio by just 130,000 votes with more than 250,000 yet to be counted, walked away less than 12 hours after exit polls showed him a clear victor.
Gore fought a little, but instead of embracing martyrdom, opted for boredom, and for making sure there was no challenge in the US Senate to the votes stolen.
Nationwide, Bush's alleged 3 million-vote nationwide margin in 2004, and 600 votes in Florida 2000, were as fictional as those ballots the Ayatollahs now admit should not exist.
Moussavi believes he has a date with destiny. But Kerry apparently had one on the golf course. Gore's failure to effectively respond in Florida 2000 remains an inconvenient truth.
Blackwell, Florida's Jeb Bush and Iran's Revolutionary Guard used registration tampering, disinformation, intimidation and fraud to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters before the balloting.
Blackwell and Bush then used a lethal mix of black box machines, faulty scantrons and hijacked ballots to finish the job. Blackwell worked with Diebold, ES&S, Triad, and other electronic magicians that let him disappear or switch all the votes he needed with a few keystrokes at around 2am election night. His high-tech IT henchman, Michael Connell, has since died in a mysterious plane crash.
The Times seems to finally understand the problem. In their June 22 editorial, "How to Trust Electronic Voting," they argued the following: "In paperless electronic voting, voters mark their choices, and when the votes have all been cast, the machine spits out the results. There is no way to be sure that a glitch or intentional vote theft – by malicious software or computer hacking – did not change the outcome. If there is a close election, there's also no way of conducting a meaningful recount."
Saddled with paper ballots that may or may not still exist, the Iranian authorities have simply trashed the whole election. "I don't think they actually counted the votes," one observer told the New York Times.
Because the American people did not take to the streets in the Iranian model, our democracy was subverted.
Thanks to Kerry and Gore, the public follow-up in Ohio and Florida was ineffective. As in Iran, the primary reporting has been largely limited to the Internet. The results---8 years of George W. Bush---speak for themselves.
But in the US, a nationwide election protection movement has arisen that protected the results in 2008, and that could make all the difference for the future of American democracy.
The Iranian people are speaking for themselves, and for the finest principles of democracy. For confirmation and inspiration, they need only look at America 2000-8 to see the consequences of unelected executives.
--
Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman have co-authored four books on election protection. Bob's FITRAKIS FILES are at FreePress.org, where this article first appeared. HARVEY WASSERMAN'S HISTORY OF THE U.S. is atwww.harveywasserman.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









