Professor Robert Pollin, economist and Co-Director of the PERI Institute at U. Mass. Amherst, is interviewed by Paul Jay of theREALnews network regarding what should (and shouldn't) be done to revive the U.S. economy

Blogger's Note: theREALnews really is "the real news" ...as compared with the U.S. "Main Stream Media's" celebrity news, partisan harangues, and selective/superficial coverage of the most important news you and I really need to understand. Sad to say, even the PBS News Hour tiptoes around the things I really want to know. I can't stand to watch it anymore.

While theREALnews is far from my only news source, it's a very good one. So I check their nearly daily offerings, which I receive free by e-mail, and play the videos that most interest me. I blog what I believe to be the the best of the best, which I am doing today. I hadn't known of economist Robert Pollin before but was immediately struck by his handsome visage and impressed by the lucidity of his explainations of the economic dilemma we presently face. And I can't imagine a better interviewer than Paul Jay, who incisively fires well selected questions at the guests on his show (and doesn't interrupt them while they are answering). This five-part series, which I gathered together this past week, may be the finest yet.

Every time it gets this good I flip them a donation. Remember that theREALnews has no corporate sponsors (the very reason they are able to tell us the things we need to know but will never hear from the MSM).

Pt1 Austerity Not a Solution



Pt2 A Crisis in Business Confidence?



Pt3 If Stimulus Works, Why Is Unemployment So High?



Pt4 U.S. Economy a Train Wreck?



Pt5 "Creative Destruction" and Fascism

Obama and the Congress Pass an Anemic Stimulus Bill, China Passes U.S. in Economic Vitality

Graph of U.S. job losses in post-WWII recessions relative to peak-employment month.  The red line represents the change in U.S. employment in the 25 months since it peaked in December 2007.

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, abbreviated ARRA and commonly referred to as “the Stimulus,” is an economic stimulus package enacted by the 111th United States Congress in February 2009. The measures are nominally worth $787 billion.

Of these, $288 Billion went into tax cuts, most of which went into personal savings as Americans finally realized that they had run up too much debt to continue their spending spree.  

The $144 Billion that went into state and local fiscal relief was totally insufficient, as states continue to layoff teachers and close parks (and, e.g., the California university system is talking of imposing a 32% increase in in-state tuitions).

Only $111 billion of the ARRA went into infrastructure and science, and only $51 Billion of that went into “core” investments (roads, bridges, railways, sewers, other transportation), which directly created new civilian jobs.

The result of all this was a continuing hemorrhaging of American jobs.

By comparison, China spent $44 Billion on intercity railroad lines in 2008 and $88 Billion on these railroads in 2009 – out of a total of $600 Billion 2009 stimulus budget devoted to job creation.

From the looks of things (see post below), China seems to have solved its unemployment problems for the moment, which in turn gives a shot in the arm to the 35% of its economy due to consumer spending.  By comparison, 75% of the U.S. economy is based on consumer spending (counting the 5% selling houses), and those Americans who have become unemployed can no longer consume at the torrid rate they had in the past.

For months preceding the passage the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Nobel Prize winning economist Paul Krugman had been advising President Obama that he should heed what FDR learned was necessary to pull out of the Great Depression: If big business can’t/won’t create  jobs, then the government must do it.

Obviously, he didn’t listen.  And look where it's gotten us.

Disclaimer: Obama might well have come up with a better stimulus plan were it not for Republican resistance. And, barring an act of God, a Republican president would have done far worse, based on the party's quasi-religious belief that the best government is a government "drowned in a bathtub" (after it's finished deregulating big businesses and cutting taxes).