The
exit pollster's MO never changes. In the recall, the pundits said it
was "too close to call". I’m quite sure that Barrett was winning, but
the media knew the fix was in so they had to keep it close. They knew
the actual exit poll numbers would not see the light of day. But they
sure called it quickly for Walker, didn't they?
The pollster’s have had plenty of experience in adjusting exit polls to match the vote count.
In 2004, preliminary state exit poll numbers were downloaded from the
CNN website by Jonathan Simon. Kerry led by 50-48%. The state polls were
already in the process of being matched to the recorded vote. But Bush
was winning the vote count - a massive divergence from the exit polls.
We later learned that Kerry led the National Exit Poll from 4pm to
midnight. At 4pm (8349 respondents) he led by 51-48%. At 730 pm (11027
respondents) by 51-48%. At 1222am (13047) by 51-47%. But we didn’t see
these numbers. They were not for public view.
The next day,
the CNN and NYT websites showed that Bush won the National Exit Poll
(13660) by 51-48% - matching the recorded vote. How did the final 613
National Exit Poll respondents enable Bush to flip the vote? The exit
pollsters never could answer that one. After all, the flip was
mathematically impossible.
The unadjusted 2004 exit polls
(state and national) were not released until about a year ago, long
after the damage was done. And guess what? Kerry actually won the 13660
respondents! He had 7064 (51.7%), Bush 6414 (47.0%), Other 182 (1.3%).
Someday, probably in 2022, we’ll get to see the unadjusted recall exit
poll numbers. In the meantime, here's the 2004 National Exit Poll
Timeline that was “not meant for public viewing”.
http://richardcharnin.wordpress.com/2012/02/21/the-final-2004-national-exit-poll-switched-7-2-of-kerry-responders-to-bush/
Blogger's Note: See preceding post for Richard Charnin's credentials and further information on the recent results of recalling Governor Scott Walker in Wisconsin.
2 comments:
If I was working for people in the govt who were determined to control the outcome of elections, I'd be very sure I could also control what newsers and their hired pollsters reported
We know this is completely possible. Wikipedia still has a nice documented story on it all.
(edited) If I was working for people in the govt who were determined to control the outcome of elections, I'd be very sure I could also control what newsers and their hired pollsters reported
We know this is completely possible. Wikipedia still has a nice documented story on it all under the name Operation Mockingbird.
Post a Comment