I am reposting Richard Charnin’s good analysis of the late-counted
votes, but with enlarged fonts and separated line to make it readable. Richard’s point is simple but should be
made explicitly. After Romney threw
in the towel and there was no longer any active motivation to rig the remaining
vote count, that remaining vote count gives us a better estimate and view of the
actual voting distribution; this in turns gives us an excellent estimate of the
extent of the routine fraud, notwithstanding the sampling bias (hah!) in the
late-counted votes. Richard asks
why CNN has not updated its figures.
The better question is why CNN, the mainstream media generally, and the
Obama DOJ does not leap to attention and bring the brigands to justice. The answer is that the fraud that
Richard and others have uncovered is and remains in the realm of state crimes,
i.e., crimes done by elements of the rulings class with ties to the intelligence
and finance community, often using their resources to organize lower level
troops at the grounds level, that are too deep and long-standing to challenge
without an overt war within the ruling class that risks involving the people
directly, a contingency that all parties agree is to be avoided at all
costs. The problem is not and has never been that the upper levels of
power of the "Democratic" party do not know what is happening; they know very
well. But their means of exercising their power, and exercise it they have
been doing, avoid democratic process and participation at all
costs.
Regards, Michael Green
The
CNN 2008 Election site shows Obama winning by 66.88-58.43 million votes, an 8.55
million margin. The final recorded vote was 69.50-59.95, a 9.55 million margin,
exactly 1.0 million higher. Why has CNN not updated the 2008 Election website to
include the final 4.15 million votes?
Obama had
63.1% of the final 4.15 million votes. He had 52.9% of the full 131 million
recorded.
Blogger's clarification: MoE stands for Margin of Error.. Think about this! At the end of a proof, the mathematician writes "Q.E.D."
From: Richard Charnin
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 12:03 PM
Subject: [ei] Re: The Late Recorded Votes: A confirmation of the
True Vote?
Obama had 63.1% of the final 4.15
million votes. He had 52.9% of the full 131 million
recorded.
What is the MoE for a 4 million
polling sample?
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:34:38 PM UTC-5, Richard Charnin wrote:
provides updated state votes which are
included in the https://docs.google.com/ spreadsheet/ccc?key= 0AjAk1JUWDMyRdDQzLWJTdlppakNRN DlMakhhMGdGa0E#gid=29">2012
Forecasting model.
On Sunday, November 11, 2012 2:34:38 PM UTC-5, Richard Charnin wrote:
The CNN 2008 Election site shows Obama winning by 66.88-58.43 million votes, an 8.55 million margin. The final recorded vote was 69.50-59.95, a 9.55 million margin, exactly 1.0 million higher. Why has CNN not updated the 2008 Election website to include the final 4.15 million votes?
On Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:12:28 PM UTC-5, Richard Charnin wrote:
The Late Recorded Votes: A confirmation of the True Vote?Richard CharninNov. 10, 2012In the 2000, 2004, and 2008 elections, the late votes recorded after Election Day showed a dramatic increase in Democratic vote shares.2000- 102.6 million votes recorded on Election Day. Gore led 48.3-48.1%.Gore had 55.6% of the 2.7 million late votes.2004- 116.7 million votes recorded on Election Day. Bush led 51.6-48.3%.Kerry had 54.2% of the 4.8 million late 2-party votes.2008- 121 million votes recorded on Election Day. Obama led 52.3-46.3%.Obama won the 10.2 million late votes by 59.2-37.5%.http://uselectionatlas. org/RESULTS/data.php?year= 2012&datatype=national& amp;def=1&f=0&off=0& amp;elect=0">Dave Leip’s US Election Atlas
I am calculating the incremental changes in the
vote count on a daily basis. Check the updates right here.
Nov.8 - Obama led by 50.34-48.07% (117.45 million recorded votes)
Nov.9 - he led by 50.43-47.97% (119.58 million recorded)
Nov.10- he led by 50.51-47.87% (122.20 million recorded)
Obama leads by 54.65-42.96% in the 4.75 million late
votes.
The True Vote Model indicated that he had an approximate 55% True Vote.
A coincidence?
The late votes can be viewed as a proxy for the unadjusted exit polls -
a very big exit poll with millions of respondents who told the
pollster exactly how they voted. Of course, we won't see the unadjusted exit
polls until years later. And 19 states were not even exit polled this time.
All we have is the National Exit Pol which is always forced to match the
recorded vote. It shows that Obama was a 50-48% winner. But all the
demographic crosstabs were forced to conform to the recorded vote. I
included them in the 2012 Presidential True Vote /Election Fraud Forecast
Model in which I calculated total vote shares.
As is the case in every presidential election since 1988, the Democrat
Obama did much better than the recorded vote. If they are to be believed,
the Late Votes are another confirmation of systematic election fraud.
Let’s see what happens as the recorded votes continue to come in.
Why would the late votes always show an increase in the Democratic vote
share?
- Could it be that since the winner has been decided, there is no
longer an incentive on the part of the perennial vote thieves to continue
switching late votes? Plausible.
- Could it be that the late votes are paper ballots (provisionals,
absentees) and not from DREs? Absolutely.
- Could it be that the late votes are coming in from Democratic
strongholds? Maybe some, but surely not all.
You decide.
