rsn
(Reader Supported News) Subscribe to free newsletter
 |
| Senator Bernie Sanders is interviewed by a Reuters reporter, 11/28/06. (photo: Reuters) |
The Road to Oligarchy
26 July 2012
The Senate Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights held a hearing Tuesday on “Taking Back Our Democracy: Responding to Citizens United and the Rise of Super PACs” Here is Sen. Bernie Sanders’ testimony:
r.
Chairman, thank you for convening a hearing on the monumentally
important issue of “Taking Back Our Democracy.” Unfortunately, that
title exactly describes the challenge facing us today.
The history of this country has been the drive toward a
more and more inclusive democracy—a democracy which would fulfill
Abraham Lincoln’s beautiful phraseology at Gettysburg in which he
described America as a nation “of the people by the people for the
people.”
We all know American democracy has not always lived up
to this ideal. When this country was founded, only white male property
owners over age 21 could vote. But people fought to change that and we
became a more inclusive democracy. After the Civil War, we amended the
Constitution to allow non-white men to vote. We became a more inclusive
democracy. In 1920, after years of struggle and against enormous
opposition, we finally ratified the 19th Amendment, guaranteeing women the right to vote. We became a more inclusive democracy.
In 1965, under the leadership of Martin Luther King,
Jr. and others, the great civil rights movement finally succeeded in
outlawing racism at the ballot box and LBJ signed the Voting Rights Act. We became a more inclusive democracy.
One year after that, the Supreme Court ruled that the
poll tax was unconstitutional, that people could not be denied the right
to vote because they were low-income. We became a more inclusive
democracy. In 1971, young people throughout the country said; “we are
being drafted to go to Vietnam and get killed, but we don’t even have
the right to vote.” The voting age was lowered to 18. We became a more
inclusive democracy.
The democratic foundations of our country and this
movement toward a more inclusive democracy are now facing the most
severe attacks, both economically and politically, that we have seen in
the modern history of our country. Tragically, as I say this advisedly,
we are well on our way to seeing our great country move toward an
oligarchic form of government – where virtually all economic and
political power rest with a handful of very wealthy families. This is a
trend we must reverse.
Economically, the United States today has, by far, the
most unequal distribution of wealth and income of any major country on
earth and that inequality is worse today in America than at any time
since the late 1920s.
Today, the wealthiest 400 individuals own more wealth than the bottom half of America - 150 million people.
Today, one family, the Walton family of
Wal-Mart fame, with $89 billion, own more wealth than the bottom 40
percent of America. One family owns more wealth than the bottom 40
percent.
Today, the top one percent own 40
percent of all wealth, while the bottom sixty percent owns less than 2
percent. Incredibly, the bottom 40 percent of all Americans own just
3/10 of one percent of the wealth of the country.
That is what is going on economically in this country.
A handful of billionaires own a significant part of the wealth of
America and have enormous control over our economy. What the Supreme
Court did in Citizens United is to say to these same billionaires: “You
own and control the economy, you own Wall Street, you own the coal
companies, you own the oil companies. Now, for a very small percentage
of your wealth, we’re going to give you the opportunity to own the
United States government.” That is the essence of what Citizens United
is all about – and that’s why it must be overturned.
Let’s be clear. Why should we be surprised that one
family, worth $50 billion, is prepared to spend $400 million in this
election to protect their interests? That’s a small investment for them
and a good investment. But it is not only the Koch brothers.
There are at least 23 billionaire families
who have contributed a minimum of $250,000 each into the political
process up to now during this campaign; my guess is that number is
really much greater because many of these contributions are made in
secret. In other words, not content to own our economy, the one percent
want to own our government as well.
The constitutional amendment that Congressman Ted Deutch and I have introduced states the following:
· For-profit corporations are not people, and are not entitled to any rights under the Constitution.
· For-profit corporations are entities of the
states, and are subject to regulation by the legislatures of the states,
so long as the regulations do not limit the freedom of the press.
· For-profit corporations are prohibited from making contributions or expenditures in political campaigns.
· Congress and the states have the right to
regulate and limit all political expenditures and contributions,
including those made by a candidate.
I’m proud to say the American people are making their
voices heard on this issue—they are telling us loud and clear it is time
to reverse the trend. Six states, including my home state of Vermont,
have passed resolutions asking us to pass a constitutional amendment to
overturn Citizens United. More than 200 local governments have
done the same, including many in Vermont. I’m proud to sponsor one such
amendment. My colleagues here, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Udall, and Ms. Edwards,
all have good amendments, and I thank them for their hard work on this
issue.
To read the list of billionaire families donating at least $250,000 to campaigns, click here.
To read more about Sanders’ Saving American Democracy Amendment, click here.
No comments:
Post a Comment