Submitted by Michael Collins on Mon, 05/02/2011 - 05:44
His condition was critical and required medication three times a day at a monthly cost of $2500. Your company plan covered your husband but it didn't cover the medication because the insurance company termed it experimental. It was the sole option for the crippling illness according to the three specialists consulted.
Your husband contributed 40% of the family income. The loss was a big hit but you persevered. You couldn't sell the house, even if you wanted to. It was $150,000 upside down. There was no federal or bank program to relieve that burden. After four months of cashing in a modest 401(k), it became obvious that you couldn't make it. You needed relief and time for your husband to get well.
You consulted your accountant. On his advice, you decided to file for bankruptcy.
It was hard to find an attorney to take your case. The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 made attorneys personally liable for any false claims by filers. That created a lot of extra work and a new risk for bankruptcy attorneys to serve a population that was, by definition, short of cash for legal fees.
When you did get an attorney, you found out that you had to wait an additional six months to file. The new bankruptcy law of 2005 requires credit counseling six months prior to filing.
By the time you got your day in court, you were well overdue for debt relief
Here is what happened in bankruptcy court for the Chapter 13 filing.
The Bank Challenges Your Claim Alleging Fraud
The new bankruptcy law changes things for debtors. In the past, only "substantial abuse" by debtors led to an automatic dismissal of the case. The new law replaced a "a substantial abuse" with "an abuse" Section 102. In the past, only the U.S. Bankruptcy Trustee, an officer of the court, could charge fraud. Creditors now have that option (many of whom stand accused of fraud themselves).
It is obvious that the Department of Justice program is only interested in debtor fraud. There is no solicitation by the program for creditor fraud reports. Just debtors.
The Bank Leaves out Documentation Critical to Lawful Approval of their Claims against You
Kathleen M. Porter published a landmark study on bankruptcy court in 2007. Porter's research team reviewed 1700 bankruptcy rulings from federal courts across the country. Porter found that required documentation was missing in just over 50% of the cases from the extensive sample.
Professor Porter commented on this failure to comply with documentation requirements:
Porter's research confirmed that only a minority of bankruptcy courts use incomplete documentation to disallow creditor claims. The failure to require proper documentation distorts over 50% of settlements. How can a bankruptcy judge set amounts owed, etc. without knowing the basis for such judgments?
The creditors with the special right to accuse you of fraud get away with filing flawed claims against you. Are their cases dismissed for errors? Hardly ever, according to the study.
You had no idea that the creditor clams were incomplete thus legally flawed. Neither the court nor your lawyer noticed.
There are Creditor Fees that You Don't Understand
The paper chase of bankruptcy often times produces conflicting claims about amounts due. Debtors face tremendous pressure to readjust their entire lives to cope with impending financial doom. The graph below shows that creditors are much more likely to state claims in their favor than are debtors.
Debtors often listed more than they owed. Creditor usually listed more than they were due. Porter's extensive analysis suggested the following:
Once again, the debtors take the hit, the very people lacking the resources to challenge what they strongly suspect are creditor overstatements of debt.
The Bank Claim is Approved
You suspect errors in the creditor claims but you can't prove that their figures are overstated. You do not know that your creditors are missing documentation, an error that should nullify their claims.
When debtors make a mistake, their case is subject to dismissal and they face severe penalties. When the courts receive and approve flawed, unlawful creditor filings in 50% of the cases, the court isn't even conducting a cursory review of essential documents. With any degree of diligence, most or all of the flawed creditor filings would be dismissed.
This proves, beyond any doubt, that in many cases, bankruptcy proceedings move forward without creditor adherence to clearly stated legal requirements.
The sole purpose of the court is to enforce the law. That simply doesn't happen for at least 50% of the cases judged.
Later, You Find Out that the Critical Documents were Missing and the Charges were Bogus
Bankruptcy Hell - Abandon hope all ye who enter here
There is no justice guaranteed for the weak, disadvantaged, poor, or dispossessed. Debtors filing bankruptcy operate on a limited budget and simply want the nightmare to end. They want to get on with their lives. They often lack the ability to make legal challenges. When their lawyers don't inform them of those challenges, they have no options.
In the 50% of the cases where critical documents were missing, their lawyers fail to make the challenge. Worse still, in those and other cases where creditor filings are obviously deficient and outside the law, the court misses the error.
Wouldn't it be better if bankruptcy court operated like, let's say, an automobile manufacturer. Honda issued a recall on airbags for 2001 and 2002 models.
Based on 12 incidents brought to their attention, Honda recalled every vehicle suspected, nearly 400,000.
At least seven federal courts have cited Katherine Porter's study. Her study included over 1,700 cases., half of which had a defective part - missing documentation required by law to justify the bankruptcy. Compare 850 instances of a defective part with no corrective action to the twelve instances referenced by Honda that generated a universal recall of models for two consecutive years.
Perhaps, the federal bankruptcy courts should emulate the judgment and practices of Honda.
The failure of bankruptcy courts to apply the law equally and the refusal to go back and correct every error in judgment demonstrate that we are clearly not a nation of laws. We are a nation in which the front room of the law serves the back room of The Money Party.