Showing posts with label ploy to cut Social Security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ploy to cut Social Security. Show all posts

Monday, July 25, 2011

YET ANOTHER ECONOMIST ASSERTS THAT THE DEBT CEILING "CRISIS" IS A CONTRIVED COVER FOR ROBBING AMERICANS OF THEIR SOCIAL SAFETY NET.


  theREALnews

July 25, 2011

Debt Ceiling Extortion

Yves Smith: The finance sector used extortion against the American people in 2007-09 and are doing it again now

More at The Real News

Bio

Yves Smith has written the popular and trenchant financial blog "Naked Capitalism" since 2006. Yves has spent more than 25 years in the financial services industry and currently heads Aurora Advisors, a New York-based management consulting firm specializing in corporate finance advisory and financial services. Prior experience includes Goldman Sachs (in corporate finance), McKinsey & Co., and Sumitomo Bank (as head of mergers and acquisitions). Yves has written for publications in the United States and Australia, including The New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor, Slate, The Conference Board Review, Institutional Investor, The Daily Deal and the Australian Financial Review. Yves is a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Business School.

Sunday, July 17, 2011

REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMEN PLAYING A GAME OF "CHICKEN" WITH THE U.S. ECONOMY. LIKE THE LEATHAL GAME WITH AUTOMOBILES, IT REQUIRES WILLFUL IDIOCY: NEITHER DEATH NOR THE DESTRUCTION OF THE AMERICAN ECONOMY IS TOO GREAT A PRICE TO PAY FOR BEATING ONE'S ENEMY.






July 15, 2011

U.S. Debt Default Looms as Talks Still on Deficit Reduction - Democracy Now! Part 1 of 2

ThisBoyTV


U.S. Debt Default Looms as Talks Still on Deficit Reduction - Democracy Now! Part 2 of 2

ThisBoyTV


Original Headline and summary:

U.S. Debt Default Looms as Talks Stall on Deficit Reduction: “We Are Playing with Fire”

Discussion on a deficit reduction deal has stalled after five consecutive days of negotiations between Republicans and Democrats. In order to borrow beyond August 2, the United States must raise its $14.3 trillion debt ceiling. This week, Standard & Poor’s became the second of the major credit rating agencies to place U.S. debt under review, citing an increasing risk of a payment default. Republicans are pushing for massive spending cuts, many of which Obama has agreed to, even as Democrats say they want to raise taxes on corporations and wealthy households. We speak with Jeff Madrick, director of policy research at the Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis at The New School and author of "Age of Greed: The Triumph of Finance and the Decline of America, 1970 to the Present." [Original includes rush transcript]

Saturday, July 16, 2011

MUST-WATCH FOR ANY AMERICAN WHO DOESN'T UNDERSTAND WHAT OBAMA AND THE CONGRESS ARE PLANNING TO CARRY OFF ON BEHALF OF THE BIG BANKS UNDER THE RUSE OF "AVOIDING DEFAULT ON THE NATIONAL DEBT." WILL AMERICANS STAND UP LIKE THE GREEKS ...OR LIE DOWN LIKE SHEEP?


  theREALnews

Greece--a Dress Rehearsal for United States

Michael Hudson: Cuts to Social Security and Medicare and privatization at the state level mirror strategy imposed on Greece

PERMALINK

More at The Real News

Bio

Michael Hudson is President of The Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends (ISLET), a Wall Street Financial Analyst, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City and author of Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire (1968 & 2003), Trade, Development and Foreign Debt (1992 & 2009) and of The Myth of Aid (1971). ISLET engages in research regarding domestic and international finance, national income and balance-sheet accounting with regard to real estate, and the economic history of the ancient Near East. Michael acts as an economic advisor to governments worldwide including Iceland, Latvia and China on finance and tax law.

Saturday, July 09, 2011

OBAMA GETS SET TO CAVE TO REPUBLICAN PRESSURE TO CUT SOCIAL SECURITY, MEDICARE, AND MEDICAIDE -- SUPPOSEDLY TO CUT THE BUDGET DEFICIT BUT IN REALITY TO TAKE THE VAULES OF THESE SERVICES AND GIVE THE MONEY TO WALL STREET, WHICH WILL POCKET THE MONEY WITHOUT CREATING A SINGLE JOB


  theREALnews

Debt Ceiling Charade a Move to the Right

Michael Hudson: Panic about debt ceiling used to attack social programs; no real need for more borrowing

PERMALINK
More at The Real News

Bio

Michael Hudson is President of The Institute for the Study of Long-Term Economic Trends (ISLET), a Wall Street Financial Analyst, Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City and author of Super-Imperialism: The Economic Strategy of American Empire (1968 & 2003), Trade, Development and Foreign Debt (1992 & 2009) and of The Myth of Aid (1971). ISLET engages in research regarding domestic and international finance, national income and balance-sheet accounting with regard to real estate, and the economic history of the ancient Near East. Michael acts as an economic advisor to governments worldwide including Iceland, Latvia and China on finance and tax law.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

WHY DID S&P LOWER THE U.S. CREDIT RATING? BECAUSE THE DOLLAR IS AT RISK OF LOSING ITS POSITION AS THE WORLDS RESERVE CURRENCY? NOPE, IT CAN'T BE THAT (READ BELOW). MAYBE A PLOY TO TRICK CONGRESS INTO CUTTING SOCIAL SECURITY. YEP, THAT'S WHAT I THINK.


Original article here





Monday, February 28, 2011 6:50 PM

US Dollar About to Lose Reserve Currency Status - Fact or Fantasy?


A number of sites are commenting on a Bloomberg video in which El-Erian, PIMCO Co-CEO says "Dollar could lose its reserve currency status".



Bloomberg: "Mohammad what does a weak dollar signal to you, a dollar that can't jump up here on a day like we've seen today?"

El-Erian: "It is a warning shot to America that we cannot simply assume flight to quality, flight to safety. That people are starting to worry about the fiscal situation in the U.S. They are starting to worry about the level of debt. They are starting to worry about what they hear about states and municipalities. So, I would take this as a warning shot that we cannot assume that we will maintain the standing of the reserve currency as we have in the past."

Reserve Currency Definition

Before we can debate whether or not the US will lose reserve currency standing, we must first define what it means.

Investopedia defines Reserve Currency as follows.

"A foreign currency held by central banks and other major financial institutions as a means to pay off international debt obligations, or to influence their domestic exchange rate."

I accept that definition. Unfortunately Investopedia rambles on with nonsense about the implications: "A large percentage of commodities, such as gold and oil, are usually priced in the reserve currency, causing other countries to hold this currency to pay for these goods."

That sentence is a widely believed fallacy. The reality is no country is obligated to hold dollars to buy goods denominated in dollars.

Currencies are Fungible

Currencies other that illiquid currencies with low or no trading volume (think of Yap Island stones or the Cuban Peso) are fungible. It is a trivial process to switch from one currency to another.

You can buy gold or silver in any country, and I assure you those transactions do not all take place in dollars. Thus, just because a commodity is widely priced in dollars does not mean it only trades in dollars.

That holds true for oil as well.

I keep pointing this out, unfortunately to no avail, that oil trades in Euros right now. There is no selling of Euros to buy dollars on the front causing the oil producers to trade dollars for euros on the back end. The oil states simply sell oil for a price in Euros and then hold Euros in their Forex reserves.

Fact and Fantasy

The first part of what El-Erian said is factual. Here it is again for convenience. "People are starting to worry about the fiscal situation in the U.S. They are starting to worry about the level of debt. They are starting to worry about what they hear about states and municipalities."

Those are true statements. Unfortunately, his "warning shot" regarding reserve currency status is fallacious.

To understand why, let's return to the definition of reserve currency: "A foreign currency held by central banks and other major financial institutions as a means to pay off international debt obligations, or to influence their domestic exchange rate."

Foreign Currency Reserve Factors

1. Trade Volumes
2. Trade Deficits
3. Currency Manipulation
4. Hot Money

Trade Volumes and Trade Deficit

The US happens to be at or near the top of nearly every country's trading partners. The US runs a trade deficit with most of them. Those trading partners accumulate dollars as a simple function of math. We run a deficit, someone else runs a surplus.

Some wonder why the surplus countries do not buy oil or commodities with their accumulated dollars. OK, what does Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Venezuela do with the dollars then?

Does Iran or Venezuela even hold dollars now? Think of the implications of that answer in light of the widely viewed fallacy that one needs dollars to buy oil.

Regardless of where the dollars end up, those US dollars will eventually return home. Recall that Dubai tried to buy a US port and China tried to buy Unocal. Both were rejected for security reasons. However, those dollars will return home, with China, Japan, and the oil states buying various US assets.

Currency Manipulation

Most US trading partners do not want their currencies to rise, especially China and Japan.

Consider the Yuan which does not float. To suppress the value of the Yuan, China takes US dollars and exchanges them for Yuan at a pegged rate. China does this hoping to create jobs and boost exports.

The US calls this currency manipulation and it is. However, it is no more manipulative than Bernanke flooding the markets with US dollars hoping to weaken the US dollar and stimulate growth.

Hot Money

Hedge funds and other speculators have moved money to China banking on currency appreciation.

China needs to maintain currency reserves to allow for the repatriation of those US dollars. Michael Pettis at China Financial Markets points out that most of the hot money inflows into China are done by Chinese businesses that understand how to get around rules and regulations regarding currency inflows.

That argument make perfect sense, but the math remains the same regardless of where the hot money comes from.

Global Beggar-Thy-Neighbor Policies

It is pretty pale to suggest the end of the US dollar as a reserve currency when countries hold dollars as a function of math, then hold still more dollars to suppress their currencies, hoping to keep their exports up to "stimulate growth".

Mathematical Impossibility

Another mathematical relationship says the dollar, the pound, the Yen, and the Yuan cannot all be weak at the same time (relative to each other). Yet that is precisely what every country wants. It's mathematically impossible.

You can see the effect in rising commodity prices.

If commodity prices were a function of the US dollar alone, then they would be rising in US dollar terms alone. Instead there is upward pressure on commodities in all currencies.

At some point the desirability to hoard commodities will peak.

Zero Hedge Comments

Zero Hedge commented on reserve currency status about a week ago.

Regarding El-Erian's statement: "I would take this as a warning shot that we cannot assume that we will maintain the standing of the reserve currency as we have in the past"

Zero Hedge quipped:
That's a given - the question however remains, which fiat currency, if any, is willing and ready to step in and replace the USD? With all eyes continuing to be look at the CNY, how long before China finally takes the plunge to find out just who is the real reserve currency in the world?
Will Another Fiat Currency Replace the Dollar?

For starters, Zero Hedge ignored the essential trade deficit math. The US runs a trade deficit, someone else must run a trade surplus.

Second, Canadian dollar and the Swiss Franc do not have enough trading volume. More importantly, there are not enough Canadian Dollars or Swiss Francs to go around. Look at what happened to Iceland when too many plunged into the Icelandic króna.

The Canadian and Swiss economies are simply not big enough for them to be global reserve currencies. In regards to the Euro, is Europe in a better fundamental situation than the US? Would it matter even if it was? To answer the second question, please remember trade deficit math.

As for the Yuan, it is complete silliness to suggest the currency of a command-economy dictator-led country that will not even float its currency will be some sort of major reserve currency.

To the extent that China trades with Russia, South Korea, etc., local reserves in varying currencies can happen (and are happening already), but the global significance of it is wildly overstated. The amounts in question are tiny, as a simple function of math.

Will the dollar remain the global reserve currency forever? Of course not. However, it is highly unlikely any of the presumed leading Fiat candidates including the Yuan and the Keynesian wet-dream IMF SDRs (Special Drawing Rights), will take the dollar's place. SDRs are essentially a basket of currencies.

The concept of trading in baskets of currencies backed by nothing is even more ridiculous than the existing setup. People do not buy goods and services in baskets of currencies.

What can replace the dollar?

Gold, or a mechanism like gold that would impose a hard restrictions on perpetual deficits is what its takes to restore sanity. However, we may not see a significant move towards gold until there is a massive currency crisis or revolt against fiat currencies in general, not just the US dollar.

Mike "Mish" Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List